In April, I wrote about Angus rallying your support in signing a petition that would force the RSPCA to take action against Justin Lawther and remove Angus from his care.
The Committee To Save Angus was formed, spearheaded by Mel Vincent, an animal rescuer in Australia, and included others from both sides of the globe. The story spread like wildfire within the avian community. The Angus Facebook page was monitored around the clock, as were the pages of the RSPCA and the Victoria Police.There was, and is, continued news coverage. Everyone now knew and loved Angus – and hated Justin Lawther.
The committee were good enough to include me in their communications, and I was able to watch this story unfold, although most of the information had to be kept quiet so as not to interfere with the investigation. They spoke of the RSPCA’s failure to get the job done and they pressed on with the petition that was designed to humiliate this organization into action. Mel met with them personally to present the petition, which now had thousands of signatures.
The RSPCA functions in an entirely different capacity than does the SPCA here in the states. Here, the SPCA is an empowered animal welfare group that investigate claims of abuse and acts accordingly to build cases that are passed onto the authorities for prosecution. The RSPCA is more like a division of the police force that deals only in animal welfare and are able to act on their own. Animal related cases reported to the police are turned over to the RSPCA.
At the point where it appeared that the RSPCA were dropping the ball and backing out of involvement in the Angus case, the committee decided that the best option left to work with was to get in touch with Lawther themselves. Since it was apparent that he intended to keep this bird, which he always claimed he had bought from a pet store, it was their hope that they could reach him on a human level. The only thing left within anyone’s power at this point was to educate this man about the care of his bird.
He later provided pictures and videos that confirmed his description of Angus’ environment. He used words and phrases, such as “socialization”, that are only used by knowledgeable bird owners, showing that he has either done research in bird care or has a great vet backing him up. His vet, says that he did not find him to be a bad bird owner.
When questioned about his actions in the Youtube videos he put up, he did not defend or excuse himself. He had been genuinely shocked by people’s reactions. When he purchased Angus (more on ownership issues further down), his wings had been very badly clipped. Justin feels it is an injustice to deny a bird flight. In his misguided attempt to recreate flight for Angus, the windshield wiper idea was born. Not a choice most of us would have made.
In an article posted to Mel’s website just following the RSPCA’s seizure of Angus, she explained that Justin had owned a galah in the past and was not new to bird ownership. It was his experience, however, that when a parrot was frightened or displeased with the environment, it would choose to bite or fly off. Mel explained to him that, unlike virtually every other species of parrot, the male eclectus’ response to fear is to become very still, quiet and small. It is easy to see how Justin could misread Angus’ body language in the horrific windshield scenario. I am reminded about the part in the video where he believes that Angus has drifted peacefully off to sleep. Still, the word idiot comes to mind.
Mel expressed concern for Angus’ health and asked Justin to vet his bird right away. Regrettably, Justin has been the recipient of countless, vicious threats.This reality had prevented him from taking Angus to the vet in recent weeks.Justin was afraid to surface, not only for fear of physical harm to himself, but for fear that Angus would taken from him, either by the RSPCA or by a citizen taking matters into his own hands.
This was never anyone’s intention, and it should never have gotten to this point. Violence is not an acceptable solution to any problem The committee spent a lot of time removing these threats from the internet, but the anger spewed out at Justin stopped him from getting the care for Angus that the public demanded.
Mel, too, found herself in a similar situation, receiving veiled threats from people insisting that she reveal Justin’s location while indicating that they knew where she lived. Justin’s whereabouts is not information she has ever been in possession of.
Since the RSPCA has taken Angus (he is currently in foster care at an undisclosed location), two important things have come to light. First, Angus’ blood work has come back showing him to be in good health. It was initially feared, due to his feathering and it’s coloring, that he may have been infected with the Avian Polyomavirus which runs rampant in Australia. This concern, while valid, turns out to be untrue.
And secondly, as to ownership, it has been established that this is NOT Carrie Chatter’s stolen eclectus. The one main distinguishing feature that both birds had in common was the unusual chip in the beak. However, microchip papers have shown that Justin’s bird was purchased in September, which is prior to the disappearance of Carrie’s bird. Angus rightfully belongs to Justin.
Justin has learned greatly from this experience. He regrets the error in his thinking and is paying for his mistakes. He states that he is actually glad that he has had to face this ordeal. Without this experience he might have continued riding Angus on his wiper blades so that he could experience a type of “flight”, which he now knows is wrong and dangerous. He wouldn’t have come in contact with the people he has, who looked past his actions, and extended their hands to him in an effort to further educate him about bird ownership and support him through the battles he now faces. How can you hate someone who wants his mistakes be a learning tool for the rest of us? How can you judge someone who wants to learn and move forward?
So, what we are left with is a homeless bird that is missing it’s owner, and an owner that pines for the return of his beloved bird. For whatever reason, the RSPCA sees clear to retain possession of Angus even though no charges have been filed against Justin at this time. This may be explained by the fact that Justin disappeared with the bird once before when the heat was on. Although, given the threats he was receiving, there wasn’t much choice on his part.
But Justin Lawther is turning out to be his own worst enemy. His erratic behavior in recent days may the very thing that secures that he does NOT get his bird back. He is not an eloquent man. He seems to spend a lot of his time with his foot in his mouth. In his grief, he has resorted to acts of desperation and is staging a public hunger strike in the protest of the removal of his bird. He has been the subject of several interviews. In most, he has portrayed himself to be a raving lunatic, which will only turn away public support.
To Justin Lawther: I understand your pain and I feel for you. I know you are not a bad person. Most of all, I know you love your bird. Please follow the good advice that is being given to you. Be calm. Stop and think before you act because what you say and do now will ultimately affect the futures of both Angus and yourself. Public opinion put the wheels of this event in motion, and it will determine the outcome. What happens next is entirely up to you and how you handle this crisis.
Patty Jourgensen specializes in avian health, behavior and nutrition and has been working with and caring for rescue birds since 1987.
70 comments
As I read through this article about Justin I was beginning to think there was hope for him and that maybe he had learned his lesson until I read the part about a hunger strike. I know he loves Angus but I don’t think he should be allowed to own any kind of pet until he seeks psychiatric help. Somewhere there’s a problem with this man. Angus deserves better.
Being the owner of an eclectus parrot myself, or he owns me, anyway I know you are not doing the bird any favours by keeping him away from his partner. He might have erratic behavior, but under the sircumstances who would not be erratic. Maybe the petshop owner who sold him the bird or the breeder should be approached and be questioned as to his incompetent act of selling a bird this sensitive to his environment and activities around him without informing the new owner in the do’s and don’ts. The eclectus male parrots reaction to fear and how they deal with it is one of the first things that should have been brought to the attention of a new owner of an eclectus parrot. It would not surprise me if this parrot was bought from a pet shop owner who did not the breed at all. Etienne
Being the owner of an eclectus parrot myself, or he owns me, anyway I know you are not doing the bird any favours by keeping him away from his partner. He might have erratic behavior, but under the sircumstances who would not be erratic. Maybe the petshop owner who sold him the bird or the breeder should be approached and be questioned as to his incompetent act of selling a bird this sensitive to his environment and activities around him without informing the new owner in the do’s and don’ts. The eclectus male parrots reaction to fear and how they deal with it is one of the first things that should have been brought to the attention of a new owner of an eclectus parrot. It would not surprise me if this parrot was bought from a pet shop owner who did not the breed at all. Etienne
If that was a human baby, would it be given back ? It’s common sense to NOT do something that foolish. Some people should just NOT have animals or children.
no justin does not deserve to have angus back. he is still displaying bad behavior and his lack of judgement for angus safty. angus could have been killed during his ordeal. find angus a home with someone that will care and love him. wanita
Return the bird to his owner. Justin will for sure be a better Dad in the future. Ben (South Africa)
give justin the bird back. it is this baby
Hi there, I hate to be the A-Hole here, but are basing this on the word of Mel? Don’t get me wrong, I was enraged and was in touch with a few Aussie friends and we were DEFINITELY part of that “violent mob” and I make no apologies for that. The way he laughed and blew off the reporter’s concerns is a man who wants to be the bad guy. There are people like us who have no problem treating him that way. Maybe this is all true and he was just trying to help, but in that case, how can somebody be so fu**ing stupid? Maybe there needs to be an IQ test to have a parrot. At any rate, this story made my stomach turn and I NEVER post on blogs but THANK YOU FROM THE BOTTOM OF MY HEART for bringing this my attention. Thanks! God Bless Angus.
Adolf Hitler must be smiling in hell. So many fascists want to be in his SS. Persecuting bird owners, who would have thought of that! What’s next, concentration camps? I have been taking my best buddy Billy the quaker skiing for ten years now. Will I be gassed? How could you take a parrot riding on your wiper unless he wanted to. I watched the video and I say the bird was liking the ride just like Billy likes riding on my shoulder when I ski. If he didn’t like it he would surely let the man know and would never allow it. He would just jump off. A bird that size is not afraid to scold you and will bite you severely if you are not handling him properly. Healthy birds are strong and very tough. I would say that they love each other’s company. Why can’t you Nazis keep your nose out of other people’s business. Patty, you are an idiot.
Perhaps Justin could have supervised visitation rights with the RSPCA and foster parent (???). It could then be determined if he and Angus should be reunited.
I agree with Patty and Julie and others. While Justin didn’t deserve threats and total blackballing by a virtual internet mob, he has displayed “erratic behaviour” which brings up red flags all over the place. It appears he has done research into feeding and training, but is lacking a certain amount of common sense. Unless the RSPCA is able and willing to monitor Justin and Angus constantly, I don’t think it’s a great idea to reunite the pair. I wonder what happened to the galah that he owned before…
I am an Eclectus owner and saw the news here in Melbourne and was also horrified. Clearly Justin was a bit of a dopey bastard and did not think through what he was doing. In that the RSPCA was righ to seize the bird pending an investigation. However, it’s all been proven good (save the car thing), with clear ownership, great health, and a basically good home and bond between Angus and Justin. The RSPCA should now return Angus and give Justin the requisite wrap on the wrist and all should move on.
I believe so many people have judged Justin by his appearance. It is so easy to condemn the poor/undereducated. It does NOT mean they are incapable of love. Reunite them.
I was horrified when I first read about Angus as I own the same breed of male eclectus and know how passive they are. They love their owners completely, but SURELY Justin should have had common sense!? Would you put your baby on the windshield??? I’m all for them being together if that’s what Angus wants, but what other stupid ideas is Justin going to come up with? Hopefully in future before trying something new he will think twice and get proper advice first if he is given a second chance.
No sorry, Angus should not be reunited with Justin. Justin doesn’t deserve the threats he has received BUT he should never have put this poor bird through this. If Justin loves Angus, like he says he does, he just wouldnt have even thought of doing this to him. He had no regard for the bird, he didnt care if he was to fall off or not. If Angus had of fallen off it would have been instant death……doesn’t sound like a very caring animal lover to me. In fact, what would he do next to the poor bird. No, find Angus a proper caring loving person for the poor bird’s sake. Sometimes bullies only pick on animals because the poor animal can’t fight back……please take this into consideration RSPCA officials. Everything might look rosy and above board but take a deeper look.
I agree with pat and he is stupid. I still say he deserves the worst because he lnew what he was doing. Remember in one of the videos he wanted to throw angus off the windshield. He’s a stupid ass. I don’t feel sorry for him. I’m still angered towards him and he definately doesn’t get my support.
I still don’t think that you are up to it. I don’t feel angus is safe with you. I hope you are telling the truth.
This is what makes RSPCA so evil – RSPCa are ready and willing to be used to steal other people’s property and punish the victim. Be sure RSPCA will find lost wrong as that is their form.
One thing we all have to remember is that we did NOT rush to judgment in the case. The video clearly showed a bird in danger. A rock kicked up by a passing car or a strong gust of wind could have torn him away from the wiper blades and carried him to his death. It had to be stopped. Period. The only difference between my first post in April and this one is that we have since learned that this was an act of complete and utter stupidity and not intentional cruelty. I do not for one second regret my decision to be vocal and active in this matter. Patty
As far as I’m concerned, regardless of any adequate care he was giving to the bird, ANYONE who would treat an animal in the way he did does not deserve to own one, at all. He should not get this bird back, as far as I’m concerned. I understand that he didn’t know perhaps, but I still can’t see how any genuinely good pet owner would subject an animal to that. He screwed up, at the expense of a living creature.
Leave a comment